NO SOURCE = NO CLAIM /// FOLLOW THE MONEY /// CHECK THE SOURCE /// MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND /// STATUS ON EVERY CARD /// INVESTIGATION ≠ FINDING /// NO SOURCE = NO CLAIM /// FOLLOW THE MONEY /// CHECK THE SOURCE /// MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND /// STATUS ON EVERY CARD /// INVESTIGATION ≠ FINDING ///
Last review: 2026-07-11
Ledger
Check a claim
Claims and counter-claims with status stamps. A denial is a response, not a finding. Criminal law and Commons standards are different tracks.
AllegedFile fact-lobbying-complaint
Bank of England lobbying complaint
Labour MP Phil Brickell asked the Commissioner to examine whether Farage breached paid-advocacy rules by lobbying against a digital pound, given reported Harborne donations.
★ Proves
That a complaint was filed.
✕ Does not prove
That an inquiry was opened or that any rule was breached. A complaint is not an inquiry.
Response — Nigel Farage
“No direct published response to this complaint located in sources reviewed for v1.”
Last verified 2026-07-11 · Decrypt
DeniedFile fact-farage-denial-wrongdoing
Farage denial of wrongdoing
Farage stated he has done nothing wrong and has not broken the law, saying Clacton voters should judge his actions.
★ Proves
That this denial is on the record.
✕ Does not prove
The legal or standards outcome — denials are responses, not findings.
Last verified 2026-07-11 · Al Jazeera
Officially reportedFile fact-broken-no-law-claim
“Broken no law” vs standards inquiry
Expert analysis notes Farage’s statement that he broke no law can be accurate while a Commons Code of Conduct registration inquiry remains live — criminal law and parliamentary standards are different systems.